The Use Of Polygraph Tests By Law Enforcement

p The Use of Polygraph Tests by Law EnforcementResearch QuestionHow Reliable atomic number 18 Lie DetectorsThesis StatementLie detectors be not alone secure1st SourceWhite Jr , R . D (2001 . Ask me no motions , tell me no evasivenesss : examining the drills and mis dos of the polygraph . domain strength Management 30 (4 , 483This article discusses the different slipway by which the polygraph is exampled and mis procedured , and recommends accepted guidelines for the proper work of polygraphs . It presents some(prenominal) sides of what appears to be a long standing debate on the dependability of lie-detector tests , integrating significant reasoned developments in the discussion . This is a good article because it outlines the history of polygraph development and use , and contrasts the pros and the cons of using p olygraphs in the public sector and in rightness enforcement . The article , however , may be considered a s flawed in the sense that it seems to point that there is vim wrong with using polygraphs . In this connection , it must be pointed out that the writer lonesome(prenominal) prescribes the use of the polygraph in narrowly-tailored , tightly line pillow slips , which , upon a deeper analysis , means that the author is against the sell , indiscriminating use of polygraphs . In other words , the author seems to imply that as a general proposition , the use of polygraphs or the results taken therefrom ar not completely dependable , and may just be considered as much(prenominal) in certain instances . Another strength of the article is that it discusses not only the technical aspects of polygraph use , i .e , its validity and reliability , that also its legal and ethical or chaste implicationsThe article is relevant to the above because it discusses the use of polygraphs not only against criminals , but! as against the individuals that quiet the public sector .

It lays blast the premise that despite the dissension regarding the use of polygraphs in the bypast , at present its use has become more far-flung and is applied not only to criminals or suspected criminals , but also to government employees and in government agencies , who are on the right side of the lawWith applaud to the article s relevance to the question on the reliability of lie detectors and the statement that lie detectors are not completely trusty , as mentioned , the article presents two sides of the argument , and the conclusion implies th at , in fact , lie detectors are not completely reliable because if they were , they could be used at any stipulation instance , at any given time , without having to prescribe peculiar(prenominal) parameters for its useThe main argument for the act use of polygraphs is that in many cases , the physiological responses elicited by questioning indicate the guilt feelings or innocence of a person , because of the way mickle are supposed to reply when they are lying or telling the truth . The easiest reflection against the reliability of characterizing outcomes such as increase in measure is that each person reacts other than to a particular bit . Hence , the person may be telling...If you want to recrudesce a full essay, place it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper