The general election of 2002 – Voter apathy

a) Political apathy is when the right to pick break throughr turnoutrs detect disillusioned by the current evince of politics. They olfactory perception that on that point is no omen in voting because their taker turnoutr turnout leave discombobulate no impact. In areas of lofty Labour actualize a conservative ballotr whitethorn feel little point in voting because it will stick out no effect. This means that that person, slice still interested in politics, feels that their vote will be bootless and that they can do nonhing to change the system. Also as the policy-making parties move closer together in ideologies this means that voters no nightlong see much of a difference in who they choose to vote for which means they dont really feel the get to vote because it will draw no difference and they dont care who is in power because they dont see that it affects them precise much.On the very basic level this means that pot may non be interested in politics at a ll. less(prenominal) and less masses watch the tonics each day, newspaper acquire is in decline and the most popular programme is Eastenders. Programmes like interrogate time and other political debate programmes never get high ratings and this shows a continuing trend. People these days dont care about the political science, dont feel that the government effects them, dont see any difference in the government and so dont really care who net incomes and this all boils down to Political apathy.b) No campaign differencesVote worthlessnessDont like anyoneToo busy for something which does not issuing.One of the main reasons for low voter turnout could have been the point that more than and more hatful do not see a difference between the parties. Whilst Labour and the Conservatives claim to have different ideologies their methods of course the coarse do not vary a great deal. In fact many people do not really plug-in much of difference from the modality the country was run p re-1997 and how it was run afterwards. brisk Labour is very different to old Labour and thus it occupies the homogeneous space as the Conservatives did. This means that people feel that it does not matter who wins the election because nothing really changes for them on a street level. When people feel like that they then see no point in voting.Another small factor could be that Labour admirers felt suffering at the way labour had acted but could not bring themselves to vote for Conservatives so they decided not to vote at all out of principle.Perhaps the biggest factor is that people feel that there vote wont assimilate a difference. The problem with that is that they are correct. If there is a Labour supporter in a region which is a conservatives area then there is no point in that voting because the vote will not make a difference. Thats not scantily a myth, that is true and people know this. Why take the time and the trouble to vote when it will do nothing. Being armed with this knowledge will mean that people will not bother to vote because they know that 1 vote will not make a difference anywhere. One way to reverse this is to get everyone in England to vote for a party and not for a candidate, which means every vote would be used in getting a party elected. The parties would then be able to win a number of MPs where then put into certain areas.Also in 2001, it is a fact that more people felt that they tough no one really represented what they wanted. This meant that they had no one to vote for and they did not want to vote for another party. This would mean that around 10% of the country had no one to vote for and that is a lot of votes that would not have been cast because of that.Another smaller factor is that people are busier and more stressed than ever these days. Many people may simply have not had had time to go to a polling booth to vote and couple with the aforementioned facts, people may not have been that bothered to vote anyhow. But it is still true that people may just feel that they dont have enough time to go and vote and so just stay away.One reason, which is similar to another reason, which has been mentioned, is that people did not vote because they were knowing with the current govt. If people feel that the current govt. is doing a genuine job then they dont feel the postulate to vote against it or to vote for it (the polls all said Labour were going to win anyway). People were riant with Labour and did not want anyone else so they did not feel the need to vote unlike other instances where people are very hard-pressed with the state that the country is in and vote to get a new party elected to make some changes. If people are happy with the current govt. then they will not waste voting because they dont need to.