Group Think Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Group Thinking Essays

Group opineThis type of dysfunctional operation of an organization has many ways and opportunities for failure. The primary fundamentals of this figure out ar the beginnings of failure as crowds seek residence and unity they sacrifice everything in order to maintain peace deep wad the group. Many clock this will clear the individuals creative thoughts and ability to join the creative edge thinking outside. In many organizations this is a process that is continu every last(predicate)y used. It is perceived that management wants the organizations operation or process to fade without any type of question or waves. Below are listed cardinal of the main symptoms of group think as detailed by Janis, I. L & Manns book Decision makingSymptoms of Groupthink are divided into three types in which they can manifest themselves suit I Overestimations of the groups power and moralityType II Closed-mindednessType III Pressure toward uniformityWhen broken down the three types of groupth ink can be broken farther down to octad ways groupthink causes failure.1.Illusion of invulnerability Members ignore obvious danger, take intense risks, and are overly optimistic.2.Collective Rationalization Members discredit and explain away warnings contrary to group thinking.3.Illusions of Morality Members believe that their decisions are morally rectify ignoring the ethical consequences of their decisions.4.Excessive Stereotyping The group constructs nix stereotypes of rivals outside the group.5.Pressure for consent Members pressure any in a group who expresses arguments against the groups stereotypes, illusions, or commitment, covering such opposition and disloyalty.6.Self-censorship Members withhold their dissenting views and counter arguments.7.Illusion of consistency Members perceive falsely that everyone agrees with the group decision silence is seen as consent. 8.Mindguards virtually members appoint themselves to the role of protecting the group from adverse informat ion that aptitude threaten group compliance.Personal styles are limited by the group with GROUP THINK. Most of the time the individual will non take the take place to buck the system or willing to take the chance of being discredited by the core group if they do not agree with the process and or direction that is being lead.Decision styles are affe... ...ve that the label of Groupthink can be used too loosely. I myself make water experienced situations where a Group is too quick to label themselves as sufferers of Groupthink. Although I truly think that Groupthink is a severe problem that exists today, the competitor being one of the most disastrous of those examples. I believe that we all deficiency to be careful not to be too swift about the use of the Groupthink label. It can be just as negative to a group to label them as wronged in their process when no such error exists as to call them victims of Groupthink. Again the dilemma is that groups need to always be alert to t he existence of Groupthink, they also need to not label themselves or other victims of Groupthink unfairly. Although there are many times that Groupthink leads to failure, there are few instances when it works for the food. This is a fine song to walk, but it is most definitely a line that needs to be walked time and time again. Works CitedJarvis, Chris. GROUPTHINKJanis, Irving L. Victims Of Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, 1972Janis, Irving L. Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, 1982Griffin, Em. Groupthink. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1997